Showing posts with label Options. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Options. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 04, 2009

Which Option Strike Price Should I Trade?

Option Trading Question

Can you blog about the strategies that you use to pick the option strike price and expiration month once you have identified a possible stock? Also are there any tools out there one can use to identify possible profit and loss and probability of success for option trading?

Option Trading Answer

Throughout my blog you will find that your option strategy is a function of your opinion. You have to nail down the direction, duration and magnitude of the move. Then you need to assess your confidence in; the market, your analysis and your recent performance. All of these factors will lead you to the optimal strategy and trade size.

If I have a long term grinding move in a stable stock and the market is neutral, I would probably opt for an ITM call that has a few months of life. I will be buying intrinsic value and the option will move point for point with the underlying. This gives me the latitude to take profits along the way. This is almost like a surrogate stock position.

If I am looking for an explosive move in a short period of time, I will buy a front month OTM option. That will give me the biggest bang for my buck and I can buy more contracts.

If I am fairly confident in the stock’s strength, but the market is volatile (like now), I might consider selling an OTM put credit spread. This strategy will give me more cushion. If the market moves against me, the stock should hold up well and the puts will expire. If the market falls apart I should have time to buy back my put spread before things get ugly.

I trade relative strength and weakness within the market - that is my edge.

As for software, OptionVue has very good scenario analysis software. It will calculate your P&L based on many different outcomes. For most traders, this software is overkill. I like to keep things simple.

Know your stop before you place the trade. If your forecast was wrong, get out. When a trade is profitable, start getting out when the move stalls. Predetermined targets will often leave too much money on the table and you need to let your winners run as long as they are behaving.

Thursday, February 05, 2009

Option Trading Books

ere are many option trading books worth reading. Before you consider one, you should have a basic understanding of technical and fundamental analysis. I believe you need to be a good stock trader before you can become a good option trader.

Here are a few of my favorite option trading books in order of complexity.

Options: Essential Concepts, Third Edition by The Options Institute. The Options Institute was formed by the various option trading exchanges to educate retail and institutional clients. This option trading book gives an overview on the history, pricing, strategies, floor operations and Market Making. It is easy to read and it provides an excellent foundation.

Options for the Stock Investor, by James Bittman. This option trading book goes through many of the basic option trading concepts and the terminology. James is an instructor at The Options Institute and he has decades of experience. He is one of the most knowledgeable authors in the industry.

Options As a Strategic Investment, by Lawrence McMillan. In short, this book is known by many as the "option trading Bible". I have read it cover-to-cover many times. It is detailed and comprehensive. It explains every option trading strategy and every option pricing concept. If you read it and understand half of it, you will know more than 90% of the people engaged in option trading.

McMillan on Options, Second Edition by Lawrence McMillan. Larry is one of the foremost authorities on option trading. In this option trading book he rolls up his sleeves and dives into some of his favorite option trading strategies. He uses examples to illustrate his approach.

Option Volatility and Pricing: Advance Trading Strategies and Techniques, by Sheldon Natenberg. This option trading book gets into serious option trading strategies and you need to have a good understanding of the basics.

As I mentioned before, to be a good option trader, you need to be a good stock trader first. Start with basic books on technical and fundamental stock analysis and then work your way up.

Index Trading vs Individual Stocks

Option Trading Question

Today Lloyd R. asks "I understand why someone would want to be long options, but why not use indexes for credit spreads? Stocks are so unpredictable and a news event (takeover, earnings pre-announcement, law suit...) can come at any time. The penalties are extreme"

Option Trading Answer

Great question. Stocks do carry a surprise component and obviously, when you are long premium you want that to a degree. You don’t want random surprises where you are continually blindsided. Indexes are diversified and consequently they do not have “unsystemic risk”. They only have “market risk”. There is a statistical advantage to selling out of the money put spreads, on indexes and I do like that trade under the right circumstances. With the market near a seven month low and the implied volatilities (IV’s) spiking - that trade is setting up.

As you know from my prior blogs, I do not advocate Iron Condors or neutral trading strategies. There is too much slippage and one big market move can strip away half a year’s profits. These are very popular “seminar” strategies and they are typically index based. At $3000 per seminar, they’re the ones making the money.

On the topic of index call credit spreads, I do not feel I’m properly being compensated for the risk. As the market rallies, the IVs collapse and you have to get too close to the money to get any premium. Look at the OEX July 600 calls and the 530 puts. Both are 35 points out-of-the-money (OTM) and one trades for $.70 and the other trades for $4.40. The risk reward ratio is not there on the call side.

Indexes have so many eyes focused on them that I don’t feel I have an edge. Every large institution is analyzing the SPY, OEX, SPX and they are executing baskets of stocks and futures against their option positions. I won’t pretend that I know more than Goldman Sachs and its 50 Floor Traders. There is no edge for me. I could tell you stories about the sophisticated trading tactics I witnessed in the OEX pit 15 years ago. If ever there was “fair value” it’s the exact price of that product at any moment. In the end, when I trade indexes I’m forced to predict what the market is/isn’t going to do.

My edge lies in my ability to find relative strength and weakness within the market and I have a proprietary program that helps me find that. There are opportunities that large institutions are not interested in. They can’t get the size done to justify trading it. There is a large advantage to trading a balanced long/short portfolio of stocks with relative strength/weakness. Choose well and the strong stocks gain more than the weak stocks lose when the market goes up and vice versa. This strategy helps me reduce my market risk. I also feel that I can identify supply/demand imbalances in a stock and I know when someone is trying to move “size”. That comes from my chart reading skills and I like to shadow them. In a crowded arena like an index, that trail is masked by “noise”.

I have found that careful research and selection can help me navigate news events. For instance, I don’t do credit spreads on biotech stocks. The chance of a material, unscheduled news event is too high. When all of my research has been conducted only a quarter of my trades translate into option trades for liquidity reasons.

Getting back to selling options, when the stock or the market are uncertain, the IVs are high and I’m rewarded for selling premium. The credit helps me distance myself from the trade and I can keep my objectivity. The key is to watch for upcoming news events and to get intimate with the stock. Know what’s driving it. Just as I would go long or short a stock, the credit spreads are no more than a directional trade with a built-in buffer. Another way to throttle risk is to size the position accordingly.

Never start your search by looking for stocks with high IVs. That is suicide. Those big premiums are there for a reason. There’s a very high likelihood that a lightly publicized event is forthcoming.

How I Use Technical Analysis to Find Stocks!

In today’s option trading blog I will discuss why I rely heavily on fundamental analysis in the latter stages of my research. I don’t start with fundamentals because I don’t want to wait around for five years while market figures out that AAPL is a good stock. That company was sitting at $15 with a pile of cash for years. Once it broke out in 2004, it was time to consider it. That pretty much explains why I start my research with technical analysis.

I want to make sure the stock is on the move so that I can make my money and get out. After all, as an individual, that is my edge. Large firms can’t be in and out of a stock so they rely heavily on fundamental analysis. They tour the company and attend shareholder meetings knowing that they’re in for the long haul.

I start my technical analysis by programming long-term indicators into proprietary searches. Without getting too specific, having a a 200-Day moving average that is higher today than it was 20 days ago is of interest if I’m looking for a bullish stock. Having an ADX that is over 35 and rising is also of interest. Finding a stock where the 20 day average daily volume is higher today than it was 10 days ago is also of interest. These are a few examples of the technical analysis that is built into my research before I even look at a chart. Most of my studies are based on relative value (where the indicator is now, relative to where it was a month or two ago). This filters out the vast majority of stocks on macro basis. As my analysis zooms in on the present, my searches target four basic set-ups I like to trade. On average, about 300 stocks make the list on a daily basis (bullish and bearish).

I trade break-outs/break-downs, gaps, trends and greenlines/redlines. These set-ups represent recent price action. A break-out/break-down is a 10-day high/low. A gap up is defined as stock with a low today that is greater than the prior day’s high (inverse for gap down). I like gaps so much that I even look at two and three day old gaps. A trend is defined as three or more consecutive closes in one direction. A greenline is defined as an open near the low (no gap) and a close near the high (inverse for redline). To recap, my proprietary searches start with macro indicators and end with the tail-end of the chart – the most recent price action.

There is a dilemma that every programmer faces. Searches can be too open (valuable time wasted sifting through symbols) or they can be too restrictive (most good trades are eliminated). I have found an optimal balance. The majority of stocks are filtered out by my search engine and the final step of the process uses the most powerful tool I know – a trained eye. I have and interface that allows me to quickly flip through charts. If a chart looks good I zoom out to a one month view. If it still looks good, I zoom out to a 1-Year chart.

When I perform visual technical analysis I look for nice tight price patterns. Once I have a handful of solid candidates that I really want to explore, I keep my tools pretty basic. I look at moving averages (20, 50, 100, 200), volume, trend lines and horizontal support/resistance levels. At this juncture I use the logic that if every other trader feels the level is important, so do I. If I can spot it so can they. If it is breaks, the event is significant because it will affect the demand/supply.

I am not a big fan of Oscillators, Fibonacci Lines, Elliott Wave… It’s not that they don’t work, they don’t work for me. There are a gamut of other indicators. Some are leading and some lagging. I’m certain a case can be made for all of them. Once a stock is in front of me all I want to do is measure it’s relative strength/weakness to the market. I do that by watching it trade. This is not the right way, it’s just my way. You have to find what works for you.

Once all of the technical analysis is done, I review the fundamentals of the company. This part of my research gives me “staying power”. I’m intimate with the company and I know what’s driving the stock. I also know if there are any news events on the horizon. The resulting “piece of mind” helps me take a little heat on the position without the fear that I’ve missed something.

All of my trade ideas come from my searches. Want to check out six of my bullish proprietary searches? Click Here. You’re bound to see some good stocks.

Thursday, July 31, 2008

Volatility & Equity Options

Successful equity option trading requires opinions on three variables concerning the underlying stock: expected price direction, timing of the expected move, and the stock's future volatility. Although most investors appreciate the importance of a formed opinion on price movement and timing when selecting an option, it is consideration of the stock's future volatility that is usually ignored or not understood.

What is volatility? Mathematically, volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily returns. A simple definition, however, is the fluctuation of stock prices without regard to direction. Big average daily stock price changes (up or down, in percentage terms) means high volatility, and small average daily price changes means low volatility.

To be able to make a forecast of a stock's future volatility we need to have an understanding of the role that volatility plays when pricing an option. The easiest way to accomplish this is comparing the pricing of an option contract to the pricing of an insurance contract.

Options can serve as insurance policies? In a manner of speaking, yes. Just as the insurance policy owner desires to transfer the risk of owning real property to someone else at a fee, an investor can purchase an option contract to protect their cash or stock positions against market fluctuations by paying a premium to someone else to assume the risk. Because of the leverage options convey, many investors assume they are meant only for speculation. By definition, however, options are instruments of risk transfer. They evolved because of a need for protection, or insurance, against wild price fluctuations in agricultural markets. To understand further how options work as insurance products, consider the following two examples.

Through the purchase of equity puts on a share-for-share basis with owned stock, an investor has the right to sell the underlying stock at a fixed price for a specific length of time. This right to sell may protect the owner of the underlying stock against a decline in price until that option's expiration. By purchasing equity calls, an investor has the right to buy the underlying stock at a fixed price for a specific length of time. This right to buy may insure a cash position against a price increase in the underlying stock until the option's expiration. Although the put protects against a "real loss" and the call against an "opportunity loss," both types of options may protect an investor from unfavorable events, acting as insurance polices in every respect.

To continue the comparison, both the insurance company and the options marketplace must consider risk when establishing a contract's premium. Insurance companies hire actuaries to evaluate the potential risk of writing policies. When would an actuary's job be the most difficult? Consider an actuary sitting in a client's home with a hurricane expected to arrive in hours trying to evaluate the risk factor for the homeowner's policy. In this case, the actuary could justify inflating the policy's premium because of the potential for damage that the hurricane's winds pose. If the hurricane suddenly diverted its course away from the house, the risk would diminish considerably and the actuary might price the policy at a more modest level.

As with an insurance policy, potential risk is considered in the pricing of an option contract; however, the risk comes from the possible price fluctuations of the underlying stock, i.e. its volatility. A market maker pricing that option in the marketplace makes a forecast of the stock's future volatility.

When might pricing an equity option be difficult? Imagine a market maker pricing an option on the underlying stock of a company expected to announce earnings the next week. A discrepancy between the analysts' expectations and the announced earnings could cause the stock price to fluctuate dramatically. The market maker might inflate the option's premium in order to offset this potential volatility risk. If after the earnings are announced there is reduced uncertainty about future stock price changes, the market maker could justify lowering the option's premium.

Taken to another level, volatility can be considered three ways. First, there is historical volatility, which is simply the measure of actual stock price fluctuations in the past. Second, there is forecasted volatility, or an estimate of the future volatility in an underlying stock. Third, there is implied volatility, or the volatility assumption that results in the actual price of an option in the marketplace. It reflects a consensus of the marketplace as a whole on the forecasted volatility of an underlying stock.

Using this new vocabulary let's apply it to an example. Companies which are in the headlines are frequently the favorites of speculators buying options. When doing so many will have opinions on just price direction and timeframe, and pay little attention to implied volatility. Consider this scenario.

With the historical volatility of XYZ stock at 27%, a XYZ 30-day at-the-money call option was initially trading at an implied volatility of 25%. However, because of a recent 2 for 1 stock split announcement by XYZ, the implied volatility of the option contract had risen to 40%. As a result of this increase, the option contract, which previously traded for $1 �, or $150, was now trading for $2 �, or $250. News of the split prompted a speculator to purchase this option with the expectation of reselling the contract at a 100% return on investment in a week's time. However, the speculator did not consider implied volatility and paid $250 for an option contract which had historically been trading for $150. In this case, after the initial reaction to the news subsided, the implied volatility returned to historical volatility levels, resulting in a decrease in the option's premium. Although fluctuation in an option's premium is often the result of movement in the stock price, the fluctuation of this option's premium was the result of movement in its implied volatility. Because of implied volatility fluctuation, the speculator must now wait for a larger movement in the stock's price to reach the investing goal of 100% return.

Understanding how volatility affects option premiums enables traders to complete a three-part forecast: expected price direction of the underlying, timing of the expected move, and the stock's future volatility. Although there is no guarantee that a forecast will be correct, including a prediction on the stock's future volatility in the decision-making process gives traders an improved chance of achieving their intended results.

Volatility

If you are unfamiliar with the concept of volatility, you might want to review the previous section on pricing options.

Implied Volatility

Before we examine the ways professional traders use volatility in conjunction with theoretical pricing models, it's important to note that these calculations are all done by computer programs. What typically happens is that traders plug their volatility assumptions into the computer and have instant access to theoretical option values at a wide range of stock prices.

Although not all traders rely on models, those that do use a volatility assumption, usually based on a historical value, as a barometer for where they believe options should be trading. At the same time, traders monitor the actual market prices to determine what is known as implied volatility. By plugging real-time option prices into a theoretical model (instead of a volatility assumption), the same equation can be used to calculate the volatility of each option. For example, while the 90 day volatility of a stock may be 25%, the current option prices may imply higher or lower volatilities even for the same expiration month.

Stock XYZ Corp:

Price $54 per share
Historical Volatility: 25%

Option Implied Volatility
Sep 40 call
18%
Sep 45 call
23%
Sep 50 call
38%
Sep 55 call
42%
Sep 60 call
27%
Sep 65 call
29%

Some professional traders have sophisticated programs that continually monitor the implied volatilities of every exchange traded option looking for options that are significantly underpriced or overpriced relative to their historical volatility. These options are then either bought or sold and hedged against other options or stock. In the example above, if a program determined that the volatility of the September 55 call (42%) was statistically significant relative to other options, the trader might decide to sell the 55 calls and buy the 40 or 45 calls as a hedge.

Time & Risk

Quick changes can speed you forward or take the wind out of your sails.

Time and Risk

Volatility is the speed with which an investment gains or loses value and the frequency of those changes. The more volatile an investment is, the more you can potentially make or lose in the short term.

For example, equities tend to change price more quickly than most fixed-income investments (bonds and bank deposits). But it's not always that simple. The price of stock in large, well-established companies tends to change more slowly than stock in smaller, or newer, companies. And the more predictable a company's business, the slower the price fluctuation is apt to be.

There are other factors to consider, too. Low�rated, high-yield bonds, often known as junk bonds, and some bond funds fluctuate in price at least as often as stocks, and offer some of the same opportunities for gain � and loss. Junk bonds may provide higher income than other bonds in the short term but are more likely to default on their obligations to pay principal and interest, just as some speculative stocks may lose all their value.

Time and Risk

Volatility poses the biggest investment risk in the short term. Sometimes if you wait, and hold onto your equity investments until a market downturn ends and recovery begins, its effect may be reduced. Similarly, if you hold onto your bond investments until maturity, changing market values have no impact on their par value or their interest payments.

Volatility may pose several serious problems, though. If you have been planning to sell an investment to pay for the down payment on a home, college tuition, or any other goal, you may not have enough to cover your costs if its price has fallen dramatically. Or, you may be so concerned over the falling value of your investments that you sell. Not only does that lock in your loss, but you'll no longer own the investment. If its price rebounds, you can't share in its potential recovery. But, of course, your investment may not recover even if the market rebounds.


Historically, major drops in the stock market � including market crashes and bear markets, when the value of stocks drops 20% or more � have been ultimately followed by a period of recovery. If you look at the big picture, you'll discover that what seems to be a huge drop in price often evens out when it is part of a long-term pattern.

Another way to deal with volatility is to capitalize on it. If an equity increases dramatically in value, you can sell it and make another investment. Then, if the price of the equity you sold drops, you can buy it again and wait to see if the cycle will repeat itself. The one investment strategy that's pretty much doomed to failure is trying to time the market, or predict what the stock and bond markets are going to do next so you can be in the right place at the right time. The reason? It can't be done. Or at least nobody has been able to do it successfully over a period of time.

Watching the Movement

If you recognize a certain trend in stock prices, you may be able to turn it to your advantage. For example, some investments, known as cyclicals, move in identifiable patterns, up in certain economic climates and down in others.

If you invest when a cyclical stock is down and sell when it's up, you benefit from the movement. One problem, of course, is knowing when to get in and out.

Other investments are more volatile and less predictable. For example, technology stocks (and the mutual funds that invest in them) jumped dramatically in value during 1995. But in the years before that many of them performed rather poorly.

Reading the Wind

The range between an investment's high and low price over a period of time � often a year � is one measure of its volatility. The smaller the percentage of change the less volatile the investment.

For example, a stock that increases in value from $15 a share to $20 a share over the course of a year has a 33.3% volatility rate, while a stock that increases from $45 to $50 over the same period has a volatility rate of 11.1%. The assumption is that a stock that increases by a large percentage could easily fall by the same percentage, providing a potential loss.

One strategy some investors use to avoid volatility is to sell stock when its price increases or drops a predetermined percent, often in the range of 10% to 20%. One way to handle this approach is to put in a limit order, an instruction to your broker or advisor to sell any investment automatically when it drops to the level that you set.

No Pain, No Gain

Illogical as it may seem, predictability is sometimes a bigger stumbling block to achieving your long�term investment goals than volatility.

For example, the rate of return on a bank issued certificate of deposit (CD) is predictable. The problem is that while what you earn on the CD may be higher than the return on a stock, bond, or mutual fund during a market downturn, it doesn't have the potential to increase in value.

When the CD matures, you can roll the principal and interest into a new CD at whatever the current rate is. But you can't sell the CD for more than you paid for it, and you can't earn more than the current rate that's being offered. What's more, while what you can earn on a CD increases when interest rates are high, your real rate of return, after taxes, is rarely greater than the rate of inflation.

Volatility's Reward

Don't get the mistaken impression that volatility is to be avoided at all costs. It can work in your favor at least as dramatically as it can work against you. In fact, a strong stock market often produces rapidly increasing prices in a relatively short time. That, in turn, can increase the value of your investment portfolio.

Leveling Out Your Risk

You can neutralize the impact of volatility with a buying strategy known as dollar cost averaging. Using this approach, you invest the same amount regularly in a specific investment, such as a mutual fund, paying whatever the going price is. When the price goes up, your dollars buy fewer shares. When it goes down, they buy more.

The effect, over time, can be to lower the cost of the average share of stock or mutual fund you buy, so that you end up with more shares for less money. But remember that while dollar cost averaging has advantages if you invest consistently over time, it doesn't guarantee a profit or protect you from losses in a falling market.

Selling Short

Some stock investors take added risks in the hope of greater returns.

Not all stock trades are straightforward buys or sells. There are several strategies you can use to increase your gains, though they also increase your risk of incurring losses. Among these strategies are selling short and buying warrants. Both are based on a calculated wager that a particular stock will change in value, either dropping quickly in price � for a short sale � or increasing, for a warrant.

How Short Selling Works

While most investors buy stocks they think will increase in value, others invest when they think a stock's price is going to drop, perhaps substantially. What they do is described as selling short.

To sell short, you borrow shares you don't own from your broker, order them sold and pocket the money. Then you wait for the price of the stock to drop. If it does, you buy the shares at the lower price, turn them over to your broker (plus interest and commission) and keep the difference.

For example, you might sell short 100 shares of stock priced at $10 a share. When the price drops, you buy 100 shares at $7.50 a share, return them to your broker, and keep the $2.50-a-share difference � minus commission. Buying the shares back is called covering the short position. In this case, because you sold them for more than you paid to replace them, you made a profit. And you didn't have to lay out any money to do it.

You borrow 100 shares at $10 per share from your broker
You sell the shares at the $10 price getting $1,000

You profit if stock price drops
Stock Price Drops
You lose if stock price rises
Stock Price Rises
Stock price
$7.50
$12.50
Shares you owe your broker
100 Shares
100 Shares
Your cost to pay back the shares
$750
$1,250
Profit or loss
$250 profit
$250 loss

What are the Risks?

The risks in selling short occur when the price of the stock goes up � not down � or when the drop in price takes a long time. The timing is important because you're paying your broker interest on the stocks you borrowed. The longer the process goes on, the more you pay, and the more the interest expense erodes your potential profit.

An increase in the stock's value is an even greater risk. If it goes up instead of down, you will be forced � sooner or later � to pay more to cover your short position than you made from selling the stock. That means you lose money.

Squeeze Play

Sometimes short sellers are caught in a squeeze. That happens when a stock that has been heavily shorted begins to rise. The scramble among short sellers to cover their positions results in heavy buying, which drives the price even higher.

Short Interest Highlights

Trading activity in stocks that have been sold short on the New York Stock Exchange and the American Stock Exchange and not yet repurchased is described as short interest. The volume of short interest gives you a sense of how many investors expect prices to fall, and the stocks they expect to be affected.

Selling short often increases when the market is booming. Short sellers believe that a correction, or drop in market prices, has to come, especially if the overall economy does not seem to be growing as quickly as stock values are rising. But short selling is also considered a bullish sign, or a predictor of increased trading, since short positions have to be covered.

The average daily volume, which is the average number of shares sold short each trading day during the month, and the percentage change during the month are reported in the financial press for each company that has had at least 550,000 shares sold short or a change of short interest of at least 250,000 shares in the month.

In addition, graphs track the recent history of short interest and summary tables provide the names of the companies with the largest short positions and the greatest change. You may also find a graph showing the short interest ratio. That's the number of days it would take to cover the short interest in selected stocks if trading continued at a consistent pace.

Buying Warrants

Like a short sale, a warrant is a way to wager on the future price of a stock - though a warrant is less risky. Warrants guarantee, for a small fee, the opportunity to buy stock at a fixed price during a specific period of time. Investors buy them if they think a stock's price is going up.

For example, you might pay $1 a share for the right to buy a stock at $10 within five years. If the price goes up to $14 and you exercise, or use, your warrant, you save $3 on every share you buy. You can then sell the shares at the higher price to make a profit [ $14 - ($10 + $1) = $3 ], or $300 on 100 shares.

Companies sell warrants if they plan to raise money by issuing new stock or selling stocks they hold in reserve. After a warrant is issued, it can be listed in the stock columns and traded like other investments. A wt after a stock table entry means the quotation is for a warrant, not for the stock itself.

If the price of the stock is below the set price when the warrant expires, the warrant is worthless. But since warrants are less expensive than purchasing the stock outright and have a relatively long lifespan, they are traded actively.

Pricing Options

The Key Factors in Determining an Options Price

To anyone just becoming familiar with options, understanding how options are priced can be one of the greatest challenges. Until the early 1970s, only cumbersome mathematical models existed to help traders determine the theoretical value of an option. Since these models involved complex equations and market prices changed constantly, they didn't prove especially practical.

In 1973, two University of Chicago mathematics professors, Fischer Black and Myron Scholes devised a model that even today remains a standard for many option traders. The Black-Scholes Model, as it is known, was such an important advancement that the professors earned a Nobel Prize for their work.

Theoretical Value

The Black-Scholes Model, or any model for that matter, is not always representative of what happens in real life. Models are limited by the numerical inputs used to calculate the theoretical value of an option. They will never be able to take into consideration qualitative factors like market sentiment. For this reason, the theoretical prices and actual market prices may bear little resemblance.

Having said that, let's look at the quantitative factors that impact an option's theoretical value:

Strike Price and Intrinsic Value

The strike price plays a significant role in the market price of an option because it determines whether an option has any intrinsic value. For example, if the underlying stock is trading at $84 an 80 call will have $4 of intrinsic value because it gives the call owner the right to buy the stock for $80. At the same time, the 80 put will have no intrinsic value because it doesn't make sense to sell a stock for $80 when it can be sold for $84 on the open market. In this situation, whatever value the put has will be purely extrinsic (time) value.

As you can see on the table below, the closer an option is to the current stock price, the more extrinsic value it has. Conversely, the further in- or out-of-the-money the option is, the lower its extrinsic value.

AT&T Corporation (NYSE: T)
Stock Price: 19.00

Option Price Intrinsic Value Extrinsic
(Time) Value
Calls
Dec 12.50 6.60 6.50 0.10
Dec 15.00 4.20 4.00 0.20
Dec 17.50 1.90 1.50 0.40
Dec 20.00 0.55 - 0.55
Dec 22.50 0.15 - 0.15
Dec 25.00 0.10 - 0.10




Jan 12.50 6.70 6.50 0.20
Jan 15.00 4.40 4.00 0.40
Jan 17.50 2.05 1.50 0.55
Jan 20.00 0.75 - 0.75
Jan 22.50 0.25 - 0.25
Jan 25.00 0.10 - 0.10
Puts
Dec 12.50 0.05 - 0.05
Dec 15.00 0.10 - 0.10
Dec 17.50 0.35 - 0.35
Dec 20.00 1.50 1.00 0.50
Dec 22.50 3.70 3.50 0.20
Dec 25.00 6.10 6.00 0.10




Jan 12.50 0.10 - 0.10
Jan 15.00 0.15 - 0.15
Jan 17.50 0.65 - 0.65
Jan 20.00 1.90 1.00 0.90
Jan 22.50 3.90 3.50 0.40
Jan 25.00 6.30 6.00 0.30

Deep-in-the-money options tend to move on in tandem with the underlying stock. Thus, when the stock moves $1, the option value also changes by $1. With deep out-of-the-money options, the situation is a bit different. Since it would take a significant move in the underlying stock to increase the likelihood that a deep out-of-the-money option finishes in the money, people aren't usually willing to pay much for them. As a result, they tend to have low extrinsic value. At the same time, these options have no intrinsic value.

Time Remaining Until Expiration

Unlike the strike price of an option which remains fixed, the time remaining until expiration changes over the life of the option. As an option approaches expiration, the time value tends to decrease more rapidly. The rate at which an option loses value is often referred to as theta.

Time value is also known as extrinsic value because it represents the premium people are willing to pay above and beyond an option's intrinsic value. For example, in the table below, a December 20 call for AT&T is considered out-of-the-money because the strike price (20) is higher than the current market price ($19.00). As such, the price of the December 20 call ($0.55) consists exclusively of time value.

AT&T Corporation (NYSE: T)
Stock Price: 19.00

Option Price Intrinsic Value Extrinsic
(Time) Value
Calls
Dec 12.50 6.60 6.50 0.10
Dec 15.00 4.20 4.00 0.20
Dec 17.50 1.90 1.50 0.40
Dec 20.00 0.55 - 0.55
Dec 22.50 0.15 - 0.15
Dec 25.00 0.10 - 0.10




Jan 12.50 6.70 6.50 0.20
Jan 15.00 4.40 4.00 0.40
Jan 17.50 2.05 1.50 0.55
Jan 20.00 0.75 - 0.75
Jan 22.50 0.25 - 0.25
Jan 25.00 0.10 - 0.10
Puts
Dec 12.50 0.05 - 0.05
Dec 15.00 0.10 - 0.10
Dec 17.50 0.35 - 0.35
Dec 20.00 1.50 1.00 0.50
Dec 22.50 3.70 3.50 0.20
Dec 25.00 6.10 6.00 0.10




Jan 12.50 0.10 - 0.10
Jan 15.00 0.15 - 0.15
Jan 17.50 0.65 - 0.65
Jan 20.00 1.90 1.00 0.90
Jan 22.50 3.90 3.50 0.40
Jan 25.00 6.30 6.00 0.30

Not surprisingly, the January 20 call is worth more than the December 20 call because it has an additional month of time value before expiration. In other words, because the stock has an extra month to move beyond the 20 strike price, people are willing to pay more for the January 20 call than for the December 20 call.

At-the-Money vs. Out-of-the-Money

Another important point to notice on the table above is the relationship between the strike price and the time value of the options. With the stock at 19.00, the 20 strike is considered the most at-the-money. For puts and calls alike, this strike has the highest time value. As we move further away from the current stock price, in either direction, the time value decreases. For example, the deep in-the-money December 12.50 calls have only 0.10 cents in time value while the at-the-money December 20 calls have 0.55 cents.

This makes sense when you consider that the time value is nothing more than the price that people are willing to pay for the chance that an option will finish in-the-money. An option that is far out-of-the-money with almost no chance of finishing in-the-money won't command a particularly high price. Similarly, an option that is already deep-in-the-money can be readily exercised and converted to stock. For these reasons, the contracts that tend to trade most frequently are the options that are at or near-the-money. In a sense, these strike prices command a higher extrinsic value because there is more uncertainty as to whether or not the options will finish in-the-money.

Price of the Underlying Stock

The price of the underlying stock impacts option prices in a number of ways. First, and most basic, the relationship between the stock price and a given strike price determines whether an option has intrinsic value, extrinsic value, or both.

When the strike price is below the current market price, calls will have intrinsic value and puts will not. In the table above, the January 12.50 calls have 6.50 points of intrinsic value while the January 12.50 puts have no intrinsic value at all. Like the January 12.50 calls, the December 12.50 calls have 6.50 of intrinsic value (19.00 - 12.50), but less extrinsic value (0.10 vs.0.20) because there is less time remaining on the contract. In some cases, deep-in-the-money options have intrinsic value but no extrinsic value. In this situation, the options are said to be trading at parity. For example, if the December 12.50 calls were priced at 6.50 rather than 6.60, they would be at parity.

Hedging and Theoretical Value

When using a theoretical model like Black-Scholes, the exact price of the underlying is important because it impacts the price traders are willing to pay for any given option. For example, it isn't enough to know that the stock is trading at $45.50 because a trader may need to buy or sell stock to offset option contracts. For example, if the market for the stock is really 45.25 - 45.50, a trader will only receive 45.25 selling the stock. Thus, the option values should be based on a stock price of 45.25 rather than 45.50. This seemingly small spread can make the difference between a profitable and an unprofitable trade.

Volatility of the Underlying Stock

The volatility of the underlying stock may be the most important factor in pricing options because unlike the other numerical inputs which have an exact value, volatility can only be known with certainty from a historical standpoint. At any given moment, the strike price, the current market price, and a few relatively minor factors we haven't examined yet (i.e., prevailing interest rates, stock dividends) are all exact numbers that people know and agree upon. With volatility, that isn't the case.

What is volatility?

In simplest terms, volatility is the tendency of a stock to fluctuate and the likelihood that it will be within a particular price range at a specific moment in time. The higher the volatility, the more prone a stock is to large price swings. Conversely, low volatility stocks tend to show a history of stable prices.

Low Volatility

Some stocks, like utilities, tend to be relatively stable over time because their earnings are relatively predictable. People who invest in these stocks often do so for the slow, steady growth and consistent dividends. At the same time, they want secure investments they don't have to monitor everyday. With these low volatility stocks, the daily price changes are generally fractional. While the long-term trend may be up, the short term trend may even appear to be sideways. A good example of this is Ameren (NYSE: AEE), a large Midwestern utility. Looking at Ameren from the point-of-view of an options trader, we see a 52-week range between $46.50 and $37.43. Given this level of stability, even an untrained chart reader could predict the price range over the subsequent months with a high degree of accuracy. Considering the low likelihood that the stock would deviate from this pattern of low volatility, the market for options on this stock was quite small in terms of volume and price. This is confirmed by the options chain:

Ameren (NYSE: AEE)
Stock price: 44.67

Calls Price Vol.
Puts Price Vol.
Dec 40 4.90 0
Dec 40 0.25 0
Dec 45 0.80 0
Dec 45 1.50 0
Dec 50 0.20 0
Dec 50 6.10 0
Mar 40 5.00 0
Mar 40 0.65 0
Mar 45 1.15 0
Mar 45 2.60 0
Jun 40 5.00 0
Jun 40 1.15 0
Jun 45 1.55 10
Jun 45 3.30 0
Jun 50 0.30 0
Jun 50 7.30 0

High Volatility

Other stocks, like Internet and biotechs tend to have larger daily price swings. The bigger the price swings, the more volatile the stock. When assessing stock volatility, traders look at a particular period of time (e.g., 90 days). However, it may be necessary to look at volatility over a shorter period, particularly when recent developments change the long-term outlook for a company.

From an options trading standpoint, it makes sense that people would be willing to pay more for options on a stock that has a higher likelihood of making a profitable move during the life of the option. As we can see, that's exactly what happens.

Let's take EBAY, Inc. (Nasdaq: EBAY) as an example. Here's a stock that had some fairly significant price swings in a relatively short period of time. The 52-week range on this stock was from $30.88 to $61.60. Given this level of volatility, it stands to reason that options on this stock would be significantly more expensive than they would for a stable utility like Ameren. Again, this is confirmed by the option chain:

EBAY, Inc. (Nasdaq: EBAY)
Stock price: 56.35

Calls Price Vol.
Puts Price Vol.
Dec 40 16.60 149
Dec 40 0.15 120
Dec 45 11.70 173
Dec 45 0.25 233
Dec 50 7.20 413
Dec 50 0.80 177
Dec 55 3.60 517
Dec 55 2.20 34
Dec 60 1.45 103
Dec 60 5.00 0
Dec 65 0.50 477
Dec 65 9.10 0
Dec 70 0.15 9
Dec 70 13.80 13
Jan 40 16.80 9
Jan 40 0.35 0
Jan 45 12.20 47
Jan 45 0.65 223
Jan 50 8.00 10
Jan 50 1.50 100
Jan 55 4.60 47
Jan 55 3.10 67
Jan 60 2.30 149
Jan 60 5.90 16
Jan 65 1.05 14
Jan 65 9.70 10
Jan 70 0.50 30
Jan 70 14.00 7

As you might imagine, there are several advantages to trading options on volatile stocks. As we've already discussed, there is a greater likelihood that the options will finish in-the-money. Although the options tend to be more expensive, they also tend to be more liquid. This is an important consideration because whether you are getting in or out of the market, you want to get the best price. The more frequently the contracts trade, the more likely that market competition will maintain a tight bid-ask spread.

If for some reason, the actual volatility of the options decreases, the options will lose value faster than their less volatile counterparts. However, that's a known risk most traders are willing to take. In fact, many traders make their fortunes selling options when volatility is high and covering their positions when the market becomes less volatile.

LEAPS Strategies

The purchase of LEAPS puts to hedge a stock position may provide investors protection against declines in stock prices. This strategy is often compared to purchasing insurance on one's home or car, and may give investors the confidence to remain in the market. The amount of protection provided by the put and the cost of the protection, sometimes evaluated as a percentage of the stock's cost, should be considered.

For example, ZYX is trading at 45 and a ZYX LEAPS put with a three-year expiration and a strike price of 42.5 is selling for 3.5 or $350 per contract. These puts provide protection against any price decline below the break-even point, which for this strategy is 39 (strike price less the premium). The investor's risk or maximum loss is limited to the total amount paid for the put options or $350 per contract. The following are possible outcomes of this strategy at expiration.

Stock above the break-even point

If ZYX is trading at 48 at expiration, the unexercised put would generally expire worthless, representing a loss of the option premium or $350 per contract.

Stock below the strike price

The put would be profitable if the stock closed below 39 at expiration. If ZYX is trading at 37.5 at expiration, the 42.5 put, upon exercise, would have a value of 5 or $500, representing a profit of 1.5 points or $150 per contract. This profit will partially offset the decline in the value of the stock.

Stock between the strike price and the break-even point

If ZYX is trading at 41.5 at expiration, the 42.5 put would be valued at approximately 1. This means that, upon exercise, a portion of the option premium would be retained and the loss would then be 2.5 points or $250 per contract. If the contract is not exercised or sold, the investor will lose all of the initial investment, or $350 per contract.

Sell LEAPS Covered Calls

The covered call, which is selling (writing) a call against stock, is a widely used conservative options strategy. This strategy is utilized to increase the return on the underlying stock and to provide a limited amount of downside protection.

The maximum profit from an out-of-the-money covered call is realized when the stock price, at expiration, is at or above the strike price. The profit is equal to the appreciation in the stock price (the difference between the stock's original purchase price and the strike price of the call) plus the premium received from selling the call.

Investors should be aware of the risks involved in a covered call strategy. Call writers cannot realize additional appreciation in the stock above the strike price since they are obligated, upon assignment, to sell the stock at the call's strike price. The downside protection for the stock provided by the sale of a call is equal to the premium received in selling the option. The covered call writer's position will begin to suffer a loss if the stock price declines by an amount greater than the call premium received.

The following example illustrates a covered call strategy utilizing an out-of-the-money LEAPS call. ZYX is currently trading at 39.5, and a ZYX LEAPS call option with a two-year expiration and a strike price of 45 is trading at 3.25.

An investor owns 500 shares of ZYX at $39.5 per share and sells five of ZYX LEAPS calls with a strike price of 45 at 3.25 each or a total of $1,625. The investor's objective is to obtain profits without selling the stock. The break-even point for this covered call strategy is 36.25 (the stock price of 39.5 less the premium received of 3.25). This represents downside protection of 3.25 points. A loss will be incurred if ZYX declines to below 36.25. Possible outcomes of this strategy at expiration are as follows.

Stock above the strike price

If ZYX advances to 50 at expiration, the covered call writer, upon assignment, will obtain a net profit of $875 per contract (the exercise price of 45 less the price of the stock when the option was sold plus the option premium received of 3.25 X 100).

Stock below the break-even point

If ZYX is trading at 34 at expiration, the unexercised LEAPS calls would generally expire worthless and the unassigned covered call writer would have a theoretical loss of $1,125 (a present theoretical loss of $2,750 on the stock position less the $1,625 premium received). This investor will incur additional losses in his/her stock position if ZYX continues to decline in value.

Stock between the strike price and the break-even point

If ZYX advances to 40 at expiration, the LEAPS calls will be out-of-the-money. Therefore, the call writer will generally not be assigned and exercised, and will retain the 500 shares of ZYX and the option premium of 3.25 per share.

LEAPS Contract Specifications

Unit of Trade: Generally 100 shares of stock per unadjusted contract.

Premium (Price) Quotations: Stated in points and fractions; one point equals $100. The minimum price change for series trading below 3 is .05 ($5) and for all other series is .10 ($10) per contract.

Exercise: Equity LEAPS are American-style options. The option may be exercised prior to the expiration date.

Exercise Settlement: A holder that tenders an exercise notice on any business day will receive delivery of the underlying stock on the fifth business day following the date of exercise. The exercise settlement price equals the strike price multiplied by 100 (multiplier) for unadjusted series.

Expiration Cycle: Equity LEAPS expire in January of each year.

Expiration Date: Expiration occurs on the Saturday following the third Friday of the expiration month.

Position Limits: LEAPS positions are aggregated with other options with the same underlying asset. Limits vary according to the number of outstanding shares and trading volume. Hedge exemptions may be available. Contact exchanges for details.

Trading System: Market Maker/Designated Primary Market Maker/Lead Market Maker/Specialist/Registered Option Trader (depending on the exchange).

Leaps

LEAPS ( Long Term Equity Anticipation Securities) merupakan Opsi jangka panjang , jangka waktu 1 tahun atau lebih dan selalu expired di bulan Januari.

Jika ingin memiliki suatu saham, nasabah mempunyai pilihan dengan memiliki LEAPS saja. Jadi tidak perlu membeli sahamnya tetapi cukup LEAPS nya saja ( LEAPS Call ). Atau jika ngin memproteksi suatu saham dari kerugian yang besar , nasabah bisa memiliki LEAPS Put untuk memproteksi dalam jangka panjang ( 1 tahun atau lebih).

While using LEAPS does not ensure success, having a longer amount of time for your position to work is an attractive feature for many investors. In addition, there are several other factors that make LEAPS useful in many situations.

Stock Alternative

LEAPS offer investors an alternative to stock ownership. LEAPS calls enable investors to benefit from stock price rises while placing less capital at risk than is required to purchase stock. Should a stock price rise to a level above the exercise price of the LEAPS, the buyer may exercise the option and purchase shares at a price below the current market price. The same investor may sell the LEAPS calls in the open market for a profit.

Diversification

Investors also use LEAPS calls to diversify their portfolios. Historically, the stock market has provided investors significant and positive returns over the long term. Few investors purchase shares in each company they follow. A buyer of a LEAPS call has the right to purchase shares of stock at a specified date and price up to three years in the future. Thus, an investor who makes decisions for the long term can benefit from buying LEAPS calls.

Hedge

LEAPS puts provide investors with a means to hedge current stock holdings. Investors should consider purchasing LEAPS puts if they are concerned with potential price drops on stock that they own. A purchase of a LEAPS put gives the buyer the right to sell the underlying stock at the strike price up to the option's expiration.

What's the Downside?

If you are a buyer of LEAPS calls or LEAPS puts, the risk is limited to the price you paid for the position. If you are an uncovered seller of LEAPS calls, there is unlimited risk, or a seller of LEAPS puts, significant risk. Risk varies depending upon the strategy followed, and it is important for an investor to understand fully the risk of each strategy.

Stock Versus LEAPS

There are many differences between an investment in common stock and an investment in options. Unlike common stock, an option has a limited life. Common stock can be held indefinitely, while every option has an expiration date. If an option is not closed out or exercised prior to its expiration date, it ceases to exist as a financial instrument. As a result, even if an option investor correctly picks the direction the underlying stock will move, unless the investor also correctly selects the time frame that movement will take place, the investor will not profit as desired.

Options investors run the risk of losing their entire investment in a relatively short period of time and with relatively small movements of the underlying stock. Unlike a purchase of common stock for cash, the purchase of an option involves "leverage," whereby the value of the option contract generally will fluctuate by a greater percentage than the value of the underlying interest.

How LEAPS Work

LEAPS are simply long-term options that expire at dates up to 2 years and 8 months in the future, as opposed to shorter-dated options that expire within one year.

LEAPS grant the buyer the right to buy, in the case of a call, or sell, in the case of a put, shares of a stock at a predetermined price on or before a given date. Equity LEAPS are American-style options, and therefore may be exercised and settled in stock prior to the expiration date. The expiration date for Equity LEAPS is the Saturday following the third Friday of the expiration month.

LEAPS are quoted and traded just like any other exchange listed option. In fact, many of the features of LEAPS are the same for shorter-term options:

  • Number of shares covered by the contract (100)
  • Exercise and assignment procedures
  • Trading procedures
  • Margin and commission costs

Availability of LEAPS

Several factors impact the availability of LEAPS. When options are listed for trading on a particular stock, most times LEAPS are not immediately available. After a period of time, and if interest warrants it, the exchanges listing the shorter-term options may decide to list LEAPS options, after consulting with the market-makers or specialists assigned to trade the stock options. The reason for this is that LEAPS options are difficult to price because of their long life. The exchanges ensure that sufficient interest is present in the market, and that market-makers or specialists are prepared to price and trade longer-dated options once they are listed. The result is that LEAPS are not available on every stock which has options traded on it. LEAPS are initially listed with three strike prices, at the current price and 20 to 25% above and below the price of the underlying stock. Strikes may be added as the underlying stock moves. LEAPS only have one expiration month: January in two different years.

As LEAPS draw within one year of their expiration and it becomes necessary to list new LEAPS series, the existing LEAPS options continue to be listed and traded until their expiration. However, because of the shorter length of time until expiration, they then trade as ordinary shorter-term options and they lose their distinctive LEAPS symbols. New LEAPS options with expiration dates in the future are then added.

LEAPS Pricing

Options pricing models contain five factors that are used to determine a theoretical value for an option: stock price, strike price, time to expiration, interest rates (less dividends) and volatility of the underlying stock.

With shorter-term options, it is fairly straightforward to use an interest rate which approximates the "risk-free" interest rate; most people use the U.S. Treasury-bill rate (90-day). However, to price a LEAPS option, it is necessary to predict the volatility (expectation of price fluctuation) of the underlying stock and interest rates over 2 1/2 years; this is difficult even for most professionals.

In short, pricing longer-term options is more difficult than pricing shorter-term options. Of the five factors mentioned above, interest rates play a more significant role in the pricing of longer-dated options, due to the length of time involved. For these reasons, professionals are not ready to instantly quote prices of options with maturity dates far into the future, since the predictability of the inputs is so much more unreliable than for shorter-term options.

Despite these difficulties, investors will find that exchange policies generally require market-makers and specialists to offer quotations (both bid and offer) for up to 10 contracts. This allows investors to find a market for LEAPS whenever the decision is made to use them.

LEAPS Symbols

In order to differentiate LEAPS from shorter-dated options, LEAPS have a different set of symbols for retrieval on quotation systems. While other options have fixed symbols, LEAPS symbols change to reflect the expiration year.

Motorola (MOT)

Option Symbol LEAPS Option Symbol
OCT ('02) 15 call MOT JC JAN ('04) 15 LEAPS call LMA AC
JAN ('03) 15 call MOT AC JAN ('05) 15 LEAPS call ZMA AC
APR ('03) 15 call MOT DC


This feature makes it easy to distinguish a longer-term option from a shorter-term option in data listings.

Time Erosion vs. Delta

One of the most challenging aspects of shorter-term options is the erosion of the "time premium" portion of the option's price. Time premium refers to the amount of the option's price that exceeds its intrinsic value. As an option nears its expiration date and the time period shortens, the marketplace is less and less willing to pay any premium over intrinsic value until, at expiration, an option is trading purely for intrinsic value.

As a seller of shorter-term options, time premium erosion works in your favor. Conversely, the option buyer has to overcome the erosion of time premium to make a profit from a long option position. The graph below is a representation of theoretical time erosion for longer-dated options:


Any stock or options symbol displayed are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to portray a recommendation to buy or sell a particular security.

As you can see from the graph, time erosion of options premium is not linear (i.e. it does not occur in a straight line). The mathematical reasons for this are complex, but the result is that the erosion of time premium in the earlier months of an option's life is much less dramatic than the erosion that occurs in the last few months. Because of the long time frame of LEAPS options, this effect is even more pronounced. The time erosion that occurs in the first several months of a LEAPS option is minimal.

However, when LEAPS options become shorter-term options (time to expiration is less than one year), they behave like all other shorter-term options, as the graph shows. Time erosion becomes more pronounced and has a greater impact, especially in the last 90 days of the option's life.

What does this mean to options investors? Buyers of LEAPS options have less time premium erosion to fight than buyers of shorter-dated options. The tradeoff, however, is that LEAPS options offer less "leverage." The deltas of LEAPS options will not increase dramatically as with shorter-dated options since there is so much time remaining until expiration. Any increase in option value due to an increase in the price of the underlying stock will be tempered by this lower "gamma" effect.

The slow time erosion will frustrate LEAPS sellers. However, the premiums available to writers, because of the increased time in LEAPS options, can provide a good rate of return in covered writing and other strategies.

Buy LEAPS Calls

An investor anticipates that the price of ZYX stock will rise during the next two years. This investor would like to profit from the increase without having to purchase shares of ZYX.

ZYX is currently trading at 50.5 and a ZYX LEAPS call option, with a two-year expiration and a strike price of 50, is trading for a premium of 8.5 or $850 per contract. The investor buys five contracts for a total cost of $4,250, which represents the total risk of the call position. The calls give the investor the right to buy 500 shares of ZYX between now and expiration at $50 per share regardless of how high the price of the stock rises. To be profitable, though, at expiration, the stock must be trading for more than 58.5, the total of the option premium (8.5) and the strike price of 50. The buyer's maximum loss from this strategy is equal to the total cost of the options or $4,250. The break-even point for this strategy is 58.5.

The following are possible outcomes of this strategy at expiration.

Stock above the break-even point

If ZYX advances to 65 at expiration, the LEAPS will have a value of approximately 15 (the stock price of 65 less the strike price of 50). The investor may choose to exercise the calls and take delivery of the stock at a price of 50, or may sell the LEAPS calls for a profit.

Stock below the strike price

If ZYX, at expiration, is trading for less than the strike price, or below 50 in this example, the unexercised calls will expire worthless. In this case, the investor will incur the maximum loss of $4,250.

Stock between the strike price and the break-even point

If ZYX, at expiration, has risen to 56, the calls will be valued at approximately 6 (the stock price of 56 less the strike price of 50) and will represent a partial loss given the break-even point of 58.5. The calls purchased by the investor for 8.5 will, upon exercise, then be worth approximately 6, creating a loss of 2.5 points or $250 per contract. If the investor does not exercise or sell these options, the investor will lose all of the initial investment, or $850 per contract.

Prior to expiration, the LEAPS may trade at a price that is somewhat higher than the difference between the 50 strike price and the actual stock price This difference is due to the remaining time value of the contract and the possibility that the stock price may increase by expiration. Time value is one of the components of an option premium and generally decreases as expiration approaches.

Options Greeks

When traders talk about "the Greeks," they are referring to the different ways risk can be measured as it relates to a particular option or position. A different Greek letter (e.g., delta, gamma, vega) corresponds with each unique measurement. Together, these analytical tools enable traders to manage risk. Of these, the delta is one of the most common. Often, you'll see strategies or positions referred to as delta neutral. According to the theoretical pricing models, a delta neutral strategy has essentially no risk from market movement. In other words, the market could go up or down and the position will continue to perform as expected provided that certain predictable adjustments are made along the way.

The risk measures presented here are:


The delta, derived from a theoretical pricing model like Black-Scholes, is a number between 0 and +/-100 that has a variety of different uses and interpretations including:

  • A hedge ratio
  • Change in price of an option given a $1 change in the underlying stock
  • The probability that an option will finish in-the-money

The table below shows call and put deltas over a range of strike prices. Note that the at-the-money 105 strike has 48 and -52 deltas for calls and puts respectively. Deep in-the-money deltas approach +/-100 while far out-of-the-money deltas approach 0.

Stock Price: $104
37 days to expiration

Option Delta Option Delta
70 Call 100 70 Put -1
75 Call 97 75 Put -3
80 Call 91 80 Put -9
85 Call 85 85 Put -15
90 Call 78 90 Put -21
95 Call 68 95 Put -32
100 Call 59 100 Put -40
105 Call 48 105 Put -52
110 Call 37 110 Put -63
115 Call 27 115 Put -73
120 Call 18 120 Put -82
125 Call 10 125 Put -90
130 Call 6 130 Put -93
135 Call 2 135 Put -99

Hedge Ratio

Traders who use the delta as a hedge ratio do so to know how many shares of stock to buy or sell in order to establish a theoretically riskless hedge. By doing so, they are able to establish a position that should make money regardless of market direction.

Before establishing a hedge, it's important to remember the following:

  • The delta of a stock position is always in a 1:1 ratio with the number of shares (in other words, 100 shares of stock have a 100 delta)
  • Calls have a positive delta
  • Puts have a negative delta
Position Delta
Long 100 shares of stock + 100
Short 100 shares of stock - 100
Long 1 call (45 delta) + 45
Short 1 call (55 delta) - 55
Long 1 put (70 delta) - 70
Short 1 put (60 delta) + 60

Like other arbitrage strategies, delta neutral strategies are often used to capitalize on price discrepancies in the market. If the delta of a call option is 45 and the trader wants to stay delta neutral, it will be necessary to sell 45 shares of the underlying stock for every call contract purchased. Similarly, if the calls are sold, stock will have to be purchased to create a neutral hedge. As the stock price moves, the option delta also changes. For this reason, it may be necessary to adjust the position by buying or selling stock to remain delta neutral.

Initial Position Delta
Stock Price: $35
Long 1 40 call 38
Sell 38 shares @ $35 -38
Position Deltas 0

With a stock trading at $35, let's imagine that your theoretical pricing model shows 40 calls offered $0.75 below their theoretical value. Since each contract represents 100 shares, this adds up to a theoretically riskless profit of $75 per contract. To lock in this profit, you would buy the 40 calls (with a 38 delta) and sell 38 shares of stock for every 40 call you purchased. In this way, you establish a delta neutral position.

Stock Price: $39

Position Delta
Long 1 40 call 49
Short 38 shares @ $35 -38
Position Deltas +11
Adjustment
Sell 11 shares @ $39 -11
Adjusted Delta 0

Later, if the stock jumps to $39 and the 40 call delta increases to 49, it will be necessary to sell an additional 11 shares of stock to remain delta neutral.

Stock Price: $30

Position Delta
Long 1 40 call + 25
Short 38 shares @ $35 - 38
Short 11 shares @ $39 (from adjustment) - 11
Delta - 24
Adjustment
Buy 24 shares @ $30 + 24
Adjusted Delta 0

If the stock plummets from $39 to $30 and the delta of the 40 call drops to 25, it will be necessary to buy 24 shares (49 - 25) to remain delta neutral.

Throughout the life of the position, ongoing adjustments may be necessary to maintain the risk neutral position. At expiration, any out-of-the-money options expire worthless, any in-the-money options are sold (or exercised), and any long or short stock position is liquidated. At that point, the net result of all the trades should approximate the $75 profit per contract predicted by the model. This is the essence of how delta neutral trading works.

Now, let's examine how traders use delta to measure the change in price of an option as the underlying moves.

The Delta as a Measure of Changing Option Prices

One of the other common uses of the delta is as a measure of the change in an option's value given a $1 change in the underlying. For example, imagine that a stock trading at $75 has at the money options with the following prices and deltas.

Stock Price: $75

Option Price Delta
75 Call $ 5 + 52
75 Put $ 4.75 - 48

If volatility and all other factors remain the same and the stock price rises to $76, the price of the options will change by the amount of the deltas. More specifically, the call price will increase by $0.52 and the put price will decrease (because of the negative delta) by $0.48. Thus, the new option prices will be $5.52 and $4.27 respectively.

It is important to note that the delta of the 75 call and 75 put changes as the stock price moves. If you think in the case of an large price move, $10 for example, this makes sense. If the 75 put delta didn't change, a $10 price increase would imply that the put value would drop by $4.80 ($10 per share x -.48) bringing the value to -$0.05. That, however, is impossible because options never have negative prices. With the stock at $85, the 75 put will be worth significantly less than $4.75, but it will still have a positive value.

Deep In- and Out-of-the-Money Options

While the deltas of at-the-money options tend to hover near 50, the deltas of deep in- and out-of-money options tend to approach +/-100 and 0 respectively.

Using the example above, a 50 call might be considered deep in-the-money with the stock at $75. As such, it's value would consist primarily of its $25 of intrinsic value. For this reason, deep in-the-money options tend to move in tandem with the underlying stock. For example, a 100 delta option implies a $1 move in the price of the option for every $1 move in the underlying stock. Therefore, if the stock price dropped from $75 to $73, the 50 call would drop from $25 to $23.

Deep out-of-the-money options, the 50 put for example, have deltas that approach 0. In other words, since the option has no intrinsic value and as little as 1/16 of time value, it would take more than a $1 move in the stock to have an impact on the value of the put. In this case, it might take a $5 drop in the stock price to get the 50 put as high as 1/8.

With these examples in mind, it will be easy to understand the third interpretation that views the delta as a probability.

The Delta as Probability

Although purists might argue that the delta was not intended as a probability, there are many who view the delta as the likelihood that an option will finish in-the-money.

Consider the following option chain where deltas have been substituted for prices:

Stock Price: $104
37 days to expiration

Option Delta Option Delta
70 Call 100 70 Put -1
75 Call 97 75 Put -3
80 Call 91 80 Put -9
85 Call 85 85 Put -15
90 Call 78 90 Put -21
95 Call 68 95 Put -32
100 Call 59 100 Put -40
105 Call 48 105 Put -52
110 Call 37 110 Put -63
115 Call 27 115 Put -73
120 Call 18 120 Put -82
125 Call 10 125 Put -90
130 Call 6 130 Put -93
135 Call 2 135 Put -99

First, let's look at the at-the-money options. In this case, the closest strike to $104 is the 105 strike. Here, we see that the 105 calls have a + 48 delta while the 100 puts have a -52 delta. When viewing delta as a probability, it doesn't matter whether the value is positive or negative. Only the number is important. Thus, the 52 delta of the put can be interpreted as a 52% probability the option will finish in-the-money. Considering the option is already $1 in-the-money with the stock at $104, it makes sense that the option would have a slightly better than even chance of finishing in-the-money. Similarly, the 105 call has a slightly less than even chance of finishing in-the-money. More precisely, the probability is 48%.

At every strike, the sum of the call and put deltas--all taken as a positive number--add up to approximately 100.

Deep In- and Out-of-the-Money Deltas

Looking at the 135 strike, we see the call and put deltas at 2 and 99 respectively. With the stock at $104, this can be interpreted to mean there is a 99% probability the 135 put will finish in the money. At the same time, there remains an outside probability (roughly 2%) the stock will rally above 135 so the 135 calls finish in the money. Not great odds no matter how you look at it.

How Deltas Behave Closer to Expiration

The closer the options get to expiration, the more the deltas tend to approach 0 and +/-100. Using the example above, if we fast forward from 37 until expiration to just 9 days, the deltas for each strike are markedly different. For the sake of comparison, we'll assume the stock price didn't move during the 28 days.

Stock Price: $104


Days to Expiration

Days to Expiration

37
9

37
9
Option Delta Delta Option Delta Delta
70 Call 100 100 70 Put -1 0
75 Call 97 100 75 Put -3 0
80 Call 91 100 80 Put -9 0
85 Call 85 99 85 Put -15 -1
90 Call 78 95 90 Put -21 -5
95 Call 68 87 95 Put -32 -13
100 Call 59 71 100 Put -40 -29
105 Call 48 48 105 Put -52 -52
110 Call 37 26 110 Put -63 -74
115 Call 27 10 115 Put -73 -89
120 Call 18 3 120 Put -82 -97
125 Call 10 1 125 Put -90 -99
130 Call 6 0 130 Put -93 -100
135 Call 2 0 135 Put -99 -100

As you can see, the further the option is out-of-the-money, the more its delta approaches 0 or +/- 100. Looking at the at-the-money 105 strike, we see that the deltas remain exactly the same. However, just one strike away, the 100 calls gain 12 deltas, while the 100 puts lose 11 deltas. Similarly, the out-of-the-money 110 calls lose 11 deltas. In other words, with only 9 days remaining until expiration, the probability that the 110 calls would finish in-the-money is only 26%. Just 28 days earlier, the same option had a 37% probability of finishing in-the-money.

A few strikes away, the difference is even more pronounced. The 125 calls which once had a 10% probability of finishing in-the-money now have only a 1% probability of doing so. Conversely, the 125 put now has a 99% probability of finishing in the money whereas before the probability was only 90%.

Pin Risk

It sometimes happens that the stock price at expiration is exactly the same as one of the strike prices. In the example above, if the stock closed at $105 on expiration, the 105 calls and puts would technically have a 50 delta up until the moment of expiration because the stock's next move, theoretically, has an equal probability of being up or down.

If it becomes apparent the stock will settle on a particular strike price, traders generally get out of the position if they are short options at the strike because they have no way to know how many contracts on which they will be assigned. This uncertainty is known as pin risk because they may find themselves unexpectedly short or long if they receive an assignment notice and the stock moves sharply against them.


Although gamma, as a risk measurement, is more useful to professionals who manage large positions, an understanding of the concept can certainly enhance every investor's knowledge and appreciation of option behavior.

The gamma measures the change in delta of an option as the underlying price changes. Perhaps the best way to understand this is to look again at the delta across a range of strike prices.

Stock Price: $104
37 days to expiration

Option Delta Option Delta
65 Call 100 65 Put 0
70 Call 100 70 Put -1
75 Call 97 75 Put -3
80 Call 91 80 Put -9
85 Call 85 85 Put -15
90 Call 78 90 Put -21
95 Call 68 95 Put -32
100 Call 59 100 Put -40
105 Call 48 105 Put -52
110 Call 37 110 Put -63
115 Call 27 115 Put -73
120 Call 18 120 Put -82
125 Call 10 125 Put -90
130 Call 6 130 Put -93
135 Call 2 135 Put -99
140 Call 0 140 Put -100

As you can see in the table above, the deltas range from 0 to +/-100. As the price of the underlying stock changes, the option deltas also change. The amount these deltas change is referred to as the gamma. More specifically, gamma is the change in delta for every point change in the underlying.

What is important to notice in the table below in the way gamma increases near the at-the-money strike and decreases as you get further from the current stock price in either direction. For demonstration purposes only, we'll assume that the gamma is, on average, 1/5 the difference between the deltas of the 2 strikes.

Stock Price: $104
37 days to expiration

Option Delta Gamma Option Delta Gamma
65 Call 100 0 65 Put 0 0.2
70 Call 100 0.6 70 Put -1 0.4
75 Call 97 1.2 75 Put -3 1.2
80 Call 91 1.2 80 Put -9 1.2
85 Call 85 1.4 85 Put -15 1.2
90 Call 78 2.0 90 Put -21 2.2
95 Call 68 1.8 95 Put -32 2.4
100 Call 59 2.2 100 Put -40 2.4
105 Call 48 2.2 105 Put -52 2.2
110 Call 37 2.0 110 Put -63 2.0
115 Call 27 1.8 115 Put -73 1.8
120 Call 18 1.6 120 Put -82 1.6
125 Call 10 0.8 125 Put -90 1.4
130 Call 6 0.8 130 Put -93 1.2
135 Call 2 0.4 135 Put -99 0.2
140 Call 0 0 140 Put -100 0

Looking at the at-the-money 105 strike, the calls have delta of 48 while the puts have a -52 delta. A gamma of 2.2 for these options suggests that the delta is going to change by +2.2 for every point increase in the underlying. For simplicity, we'll round the gamma to 2.0. If the stock moves from $104 to $105, the 105 call and put will have 50 (48 + 2) and -50 (-52 + 2) delta respectively.

Although it might seem confusing that gamma is positive for both calls and puts, it begins to make sense when you look at the big picture. As the stock price increases, the call deltas increase and approach 100. Meanwhile, the deltas of the puts also become more positive as the stock price increases. Only this time, because puts have a negative delta, the more positive the delta, the closer it will be to zero.

How Gamma Behaves Closer to Expiration

Using the example above, if we fast forward from 37 to 9 days before expiration, the deltas and gammas for each strike are markedly different. For the sake of comparison, we'll assume that the stock price didn't move during the 28 days

Stock Price: $104


Days to Expiration

Days to Expiration

37
37
9
9

37
37
9
9
Option Delta Gamma Delta Gamma Option Delta Gamma Delta Gamma
65 Call 100 0 100 0 65 Put 0 0.2 0 0
70 Call 100 0.6 100 0 70 Put -1 0.4 0 0
75 Call 97 1.2 100 0 75 Put -3 1.2 0 0
80 Call 91 1.2 100 0.2 80 Put -9 1.2 0 0.2
85 Call 85 1.4 99 0.8 85 Put -15 1.2 -1 0.8
90 Call 78 2.0 95 1.6 90 Put -21 2.2 -5 1.6
95 Call 68 1.8 87 3.2 95 Put -32 2.4 -13 3.2
100 Call 59 2.2 71 4.6 100 Put -40 2.4 -29 4.6
105 Call 48 2.2 48 4.4 105 Put -52 2.2 -52 4.4
110 Call 37 2.0 26 3.2 110 Put -63 2.0 -74 3.0
115 Call 27 1.8 10 1.4 115 Put -73 1.8 -89 1.6
120 Call 18 1.6 3 0.4 120 Put -82 1.6 -97 0.4
125 Call 10 0.8 1 0.2 125 Put -90 1.4 -99 0.2
130 Call 6 0.8 0 0 130 Put -93 1.2 -100 0
135 Call 2 0.4 0 0 135 Put -99 0.2 -100 0
140 Call 0 0 0 0 140 Put -100 0 -100 0

The closer the options get to expiration, the more the deltas tend to approach 0 and +/-100. With 37 days until expiration, the call deltas ranged from 100 at the 65 strike to 0 at the 140 strike. With 9 days to go, the range is more concentrated.

It's also worth noting that the real action is happening near the at-the-money strikes. As you can see, the gamma increases dramatically as the difference between the strike deltas becomes more pronounced.

At the same time at-the-money options rapidly gain gamma, the out-of-the-money options lose it. Just two strikes away from the at-the-money 105 strike we see the 115 calls and puts losing gamma as expiration nears.

Gamma and the Professional Trader

Seeing how rapidly the delta changes as expiration approaches makes it easier to appreciate just how important it is for professional traders to carefully monitor their positions. Using gamma to anticipate the change in delta is what makes it such a valuable measure of risk. Looking at the overall gamma, traders can see at a glance how much longer or shorter they will be given a move in the underlying stock.

In the discussion on theta or time decay, we make the point that an option position either benefits from the passage of time or from market movement, but not both. In this sense, gamma is considered the flip side of theta because if time hurts a position (i.e., negative theta), price movement (i.e., positive gamma) will help it and vice versa. For example, the short straddle is a position that is hurt by market movement but helped by the passage of time. The straddle writer wants the market to remain steady because the more the underlying moves, the more likely it is that the position will lose money. In contrast, a person holding a long straddle is in a race against time hoping to see the market move before the options expire.


Theta is the Greek letter used to represent the impact of time on an option's value. All options lose value as they get closer to expiration. However, the rate at which an individual option loses value is primarily a function of how much time remains until expiration. Options tend to lose the most value in the final 30 days. At that point, the price decay accelerates.

Only the extrinsic portion of an option's value is subject to time decay. An in-the-money option will retain at least its intrinsic value until expiration. In other words, if an underlying stock is trading at $42, the 40 call will always have at least $2 of intrinsic value whether there are three or 300 days remaining until expiration. Any value above $2 will be extrinsic value and therefore subject to time decay.

Theta, or time decay, is usually expressed as a negative number to represent the loss of value as time passes. Since the time remaining on an option can never increase, time decay is a one-way street. Thus, if the theta is given as -.37, they option will lose $0.37 per day in value.

However, it is important to note that theta changes over time. Assuming the price of the stock doesn't change, an out-of-the-money $3.50 option with a theta of -.20 will be worth $3.30 tomorrow. At that point, the theta may only be -.18. If so, the option will only be worth $3.12 the following day if prices remain constant. Gradually, the value of the option will approach zero as long as it remains out-of-the-money.

In the adjacent table, the theta of the AT&T Aug 35 call is -.10. If the stock price remains unchanged, the Aug 35 calls will only be worth $1.65 on the following day.

The Relationship Between Theta and Strike Price

When we looked at the extrinsic value of an option in the section on pricing options, we saw that at-the-money options have the highest extrinsic value. For this reason, these options also have the highest thetas.

Deep in- and out-of-the-money options have lower thetas because they have less extrinsic value than at-the-money options. The less value they have, they less they can lose through decay. Hence, the lower thetas.

When Time Works For You

The only way to have a positive theta position is to be short options. This makes sense when you consider that short option positions (e.g., the short straddle) tend to do best in stable markets. Wide swings up or down will hurt these positions. Only the passage of time will help. Neutral strategies like the long butterfly also benefit from the passage of time. The less time to expiration, the less chance the underlying stock has to move up or down into unprofitable territory.

Every option position represents a trade off between time and market movement. You can't benefit from both. If the passage of time helps a position, price movement will hurt it and vice versa. In Greek terms, price movement, the flip side of theta, is known as gamma. Any position that has a positive theta (i.e., a position that benefits from the passage of time) will by definition have a negative gamma. Similarly, a negative theta position (i.e., one that is hurt by the passage of time), will have a positive gamma.


Rho is the Greek letter used to represent the impact of the prevailing interest rate on an option's value. More specifically, the rho measures the change in an option's value given a change in interest rates.

An increase in interest rates raises the carrying costs associated with holding an option position. As such, it decreases the value of the options. Conversely, a decrease in interest rates increases the value of options. However, the impact of interest rates on price is so small, relatively speaking, that it makes very little difference overall. Familiarity with delta, vega, gamma, and theta is much more important because each has a significant measurable impact on option prices.

Find other topic

Standard Guestbook
Name: **
What is your email? **
Your homepage:
Where are you from?
Comments? **
This message is private